NuInmj30NpfSZUsbxbUC7g0/uqei97b0wb4pVZyYM33pMmfVEZ4VGkhQbSfTq6B8 IQDVAwUBN+olds9UbnbjB8C5AQGuogX9FsPwzLDleVWyLGF6vANWVqb/HsUgD3TB WWU Münster Zentrum für Informationsverarbeitung (Uni-Rechenzentrum) Rainer Perske (Webmaster/News/System/PGP-Admin) But completingĪn attack hit anywhere above the top of the net after such a setting is aįault, thus use the signal for illegal attack hit it fits the situation. The libero _may_ set in the front zone, that is no fault. > attacker" signal, but that doesn't seem to be right. I would go on instinct with the "illegal back row > rules which I downloaded from the site in Switzerland don't seem to > the height of the net, and the front row attacker creams it. > libero enters the front zone, sets the ball "with the fingers" above > What is the referee signal for an illegal set by the libero. Is going to come up with this one on Saturday, and I'll make the wrong signal, Can anyone _please_ shed some light and tell me what the signal is, either I've even spoken with our top officials on this, and they've never come across Instinct with the "illegal back row attacker" signal, but that doesn't seem to The FIVB rules which I downloadedįrom the site in Switzerland don't seem to make mention of it. Net, and the front row attacker creams it. liberoĮnters the front zone, sets the ball "with the fingers" above the height of the What is the referee signal for an illegal set by the libero. I have to officiate a match on Saturday, and I have Scotland didn't adopt the new rule-changes last season, as was our right, as (well, the National Cup does, for any pedants out there - the league doesn't
I referee in the National League in Scotland, which gets underway this weekend